<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Review: Hamnet by Maggie O’Farrell	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.travellingbookjunkie.com/review-hamnet-by-maggie-ofarrell/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.travellingbookjunkie.com/review-hamnet-by-maggie-ofarrell/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Jan 2022 16:32:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Brenda		</title>
		<link>https://www.travellingbookjunkie.com/review-hamnet-by-maggie-ofarrell/#comment-147724</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brenda]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jan 2022 16:32:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.travellingbookjunkie.com/?p=12842#comment-147724</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I was also dissapointed by Hamnet. I think because I had just finished Mantel&#039;s Wolf Hall trilogy and frankly, not many can compare to her mastery of historical fiction and the enormous merit she had to tackle such a complex person as Thomas Cromwell. I think what irked me about O&#039;Farrell&#039;s Hamnet was that it was about Shakespeare&#039;s son, and that it seemed to thus appropriate (or at least lay claim to) an elevated literary status by association with the great bard. At worst, it seemed like a bit of fan fiction.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was also dissapointed by Hamnet. I think because I had just finished Mantel&#8217;s Wolf Hall trilogy and frankly, not many can compare to her mastery of historical fiction and the enormous merit she had to tackle such a complex person as Thomas Cromwell. I think what irked me about O&#8217;Farrell&#8217;s Hamnet was that it was about Shakespeare&#8217;s son, and that it seemed to thus appropriate (or at least lay claim to) an elevated literary status by association with the great bard. At worst, it seemed like a bit of fan fiction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
